Ever since the release of Studio 2009 we have had the concept of Language Resource Templates, and ever since the release of Studio 2009 I’d risk a bet that most users don’t know what they’re for or how to use them. To be fair this is hardly a surprise since their use is actually quite limited out of the box and access to the goodies inside is pretty hard to get at. It’s been something I used to see users complain about a long time ago but for some years now I rarely see them mentioned anymore. This article, I hope, might change that.
But before anything else I should explain what a Language Resource Template is. If you open a Translation Memory in your Translation Memory Management View, and then go to your settings you’ll see something like this:
Variable List
In practice, “variables” in Studio are words or phrases that don’t change at all when you translate them. So it’s useful to be able to ensure they are handled automatically in Studio by defining lists containing these “variables”. I’ve covered these in the past… some 6 or 7 years ago!
Abbreviation List
By default Studio will segment sentences at the end of a sentence. But if you use “abbreviations” in the middle of your sentences like acc. (according to), Cert. (certificate) or Pharmacol. (pharmacology, pharmacological) for example then you don’t want the sentences to break at these points. For some languages there are default sets of “abbreviations“, but you can customise the list to suit your needs.
Ordinal Follower List
In some languages ordinal numbers can be followed with a fullstop, and when this happens you don’t want the sentence to break at this point. In German the date 25th December would be written as 25. Dezember. In order to prevent the sentence from segmenting after the 25. Studio allows you to enter Dezember. Again there are defaults for some languages, but you can add anything you like to the ordinal follower list to control segmentation in some way. For example in my sentence before last you could add the word Studio to the list if you wanted to prevent the sentence from segmenting between 25. and Studio.
Segmentation Rules
There are default rules for every language that define how sentences are segmented. They normally cover a “Full stop rule” and rules for “Other terminating punctuation”. I’m pretty sure they are also exactly the same defaults used for every language (I only checked a few) so you might want to change these to suit. Certainly there are many reasons for adapting these rules and I have addressed these on and off over the years:
All of these things are what you will find in a Language Resource Template and you can create a template without the Translation Memory from the same menu you might use to create a Translation Memory when you are working in the Translation Memories view:
It looks like this:
So that’s all interesting, and they are very useful. But the problem with them is that they are applied on the Translation Memory. They are not a separate resource that you could reuse on a different Translation Memory, unless you were creating a new one. So if you had 20 Translation Memories and they all used the same Language Resources then making a change to just one of these resources would mean you have to make this change twenty times. Painful, but reluctantly doable once. But if you have more Translation Memories, and if you regularly update them then this probably becomes unworkable for most users pretty quickly. I aso didn’t mention that these rules control the source and the target segmentation, so if you do a lot of alignment then you can double the effort described; and if you handle more than one language pair then you can multiply all of that effort by each language pair you are responsible for maintaining!
Phew… is it any wonder many users are not familiar with Language Resource Templates?
applyTMTemplate
You may be familiar with the extremely useful Apply Studio Project Template application developed in 2015 which allows you to quickly apply the settings in a Project Template to any Studio project you like. Well, we had an idea to take the same principle and make it possible to apply the settings in a Language Resource Template to any number of Translation Memories you like. This way you can maintain at least one template and only have to change this one to be able to apply the changes to hundreds of others. Pretty cool! You can find the applyTMTemplate application on the SDL AppStore here.
After installing the plugin you’ll find it in the Add-Ins menu in all the Views in Studio, like this:
And if you’re a keyboard jockey then you can also set a custom shortcut for this feature in your File -> Options -> Keyboard Shortcuts… maybe useful if you do a lot of updating TMs:
To demonstrate how this app works I created 12 Translation memories out of six different language pairs by also creating TMs in the opposite direction. I then created one single Language Resource Template and edited all four of the resources for each of the four languages. All I did then was select the Language Resource Template, tick all the resources I wished to be applied (these are actually checked by default), drag and dropped all 12 Translation Memories into the window and clicked on Apply. Almost instantly the resources I added into this single template were applied to all of the TMs:
You can see a visual confirmation that the operation was successful as all of the source and target languages have a tick against them. If a language fails, and I did find one in testing (which will probably be resolved in due course) then the TM that failed will be displayed something like this:
Here the resources for Swahili (Congo) failed to update, but the rest did. I’m not sure where the error comes from at the moment but it was only when I decided to try a slightly exotic language for fun that I discovered the problem. I have no doubt it will be identified and resolved in due course… but for now it serves as a good example of what will happen if a language fails to update. Now that I know this I could go in and manually update this one, but that’s a small price to pay compared to all the work I’d have to do for all of the languages before this application was made available!
Some friendly words of warning
As with all Translation Memory operations, always back them up before you carry out any kind of operation on them and thoroughly test how they work and can be exported after these Language Resource Operations. Your Translation Memories are valuable assets!
And unlike Translation Memories which have a pop-up to show you where they are when you hover over them in the Translation Memory view, like this:
Language Resource Templates don’t do that. So don’t forget where you put them or you’ll be searching your computer for *.sdltm.resource files to find out where they are. I only mention this because I had the very problem twice! I can only think that the lack of awareness around Language Resource Templates is why nobody ever noticed! Perhaps this will change now we have this great tool that brings the concept of templates for Translation Memories a new lease of life!
The origin of Chad (if you’re British) or Kilroy (if you’re American) seems largely supposition. The most likely story I could find, or rather the one I like the most, is that it was created by the late cartoonist George Edward Chatterton ‘Chat’ in 1937 to advertise dance events at a local RAF (Royal Air Force) base. After that Chad is remembered for bringing attention to any shortages, or shortcomings, in wartime Britain with messages like Wot! No eggs!!, and Wot! No fags!!. It’s not used a lot these days, but for those of us aware of the symbolism it’s probably a fitting exclamation when you can’t save your target file after completing a translation in Trados Studio! At least that would be the polite exclamation since this is one of the most frustrating scenarios you may come across!
There are three things that have stood out for me this year. The first is how much support SDL have provided to their users to make sure they are able to work successfully with their investment. The second is how little many users are aware of this, and the third is just how many users have used Trados for a decade or more and were not aware of what a support & maintenance contract can bring you. This last one has been the biggest surprise to me as I’ve spoken to people who thought a support contract was more than the cost of the software; to people who thought it was support only and to people who didn’t know SDL provided any support at all! So, one of my resolutions for 2019 will be to try and make sure that all our users are more aware of how to get help, even if they don’t want to purchase a support & maintenance contract. So, I’ll cover these things:
If there’s one thing I firmly believe it’s that I think all translators should learn a little bit of regex, or regular expressions. In fact it probably wouldn’t hurt anyone to know how to use them a little bit simply because they are so useful for manipulating text, especially when it comes to working in and out of spreadsheets. When I started to think about this article today I was thinking about how to slice up text so that it’s better segmented for translation; and I was thinking about what data to use. I settled on lists of data as this sort of question comes up quite often in the community and to create some sample files I used this
When I write these articles I always start with thinking about the image at the top. I do this for two reasons, the first is because it usually helps me think of some bizarre introduction (like this!) that helps me start writing, and the second is because every now and again I like to play around with 
There are people who believe that the original intention of the internet during its inception in the 1980’s was to put the power of information in the hands of its users. In fact the last three or four decades has seen the return of the wild wild west with the internet, e-mail, mobile technology, social media, online shopping, big data, cloud computing and now the internet of things. All of this has been accessible to anyone, and anyone with the ability to create a website can give the impression they are far more trustworthy and capable than they actually are. The way the growth of the internet has taken place has meant that only large organisations are able, in theory, to provide “security” and “trust” and we rely on them to validate our financial transactions, willingly handing over our personal data so that we no longer have any control over what happens with it. Since the global social media phenomenon we even hand this data over to less secure environments sharing our lives with the world and in the process becoming less and less oblivious to the implications of what we share. Certainly a far cry from the original idea of a secure and private network for the users, and today individuals have next to zero control over their personal data at all.
Every time a new release of SDL Trados Studio is released there are usually a flurry of blogs and videos explaining what’s in them, some are really useful and full of details that will help a user decide whether the upgrade is for them or not, and others are written without any real understanding of what’s in the software or why the upgrade will help. That’s really par for the course and always to be expected since everyone is looking for the things they would like to meet their own needs. So for me, when I’m looking for independent reviews of anything, I find the more helpful reviews give me as much information as possible and I can make my own mind up based on the utility I’ll get from it, the fun in using it and the cost of upgrade. I put a couple of what I would consider helpful reviews here as they both try to cover as many of the new features available as possible. So if you are in the early stages of wondering at a high level what’s in it for you then you could do a lot worse than spending 10 or 20 minutes of your time to read/watch the contributions from Emma and Nora below.